Constitution of India — Section 58
(1) No person shall be eligible for election as
58. (1) No person shall be eligible for election as
President unless he—
(a) is a citizen of India,
(b) has completed the age of thirty-five years, and
(c) is qualified for election as a member of the
House of the People.
(2) A person shall not be eligible for election as President if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State or under any local or other authority subject to the control of any of the said Governments.
Eligibility for re- election.
Qualifications for election as President.
1Subs. by the Constitution (Eighty-fourth Amendment) Act, 2001, s. 2, for “2000”.
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
29
(Part V.—The Union.—Arts. 58—60.)
Explanation.—For the purposes of this article, a person shall not be deemed to hold any office of profit by reason only that he is the President or Vice-President of the Union or the Governor 1*** of any State or is a Minister either for the Union or for any State.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 58
- K.K.Roshan Kumar v. Union of India, Represented by its Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai
- VINCENT EMEKA OKOYE v. CUSTOMS
- MARIA NUEMIA ALBERTINA v. CUSTOMS
- K. Syed Ibrahim Kajamohaidheen v. Union of India
- Vijayakumar v. Union of India
- Prem Shankar Jha v. The State of Bihar
- (In the matter of application under Section 439 of CrPC v. Union of India
- AI{D v. Bussari Rajeshwar Rao and threeotbers
- Shubham Shrivastava @ Monti Lala v. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O8cer (S.H.O.) Police Station
- Sushant Prashar @ Sushant Parashar v. Central Bureau Of Investigation Thru. Cbi/Acb Lko.
- Judgment · High Court · 2025
- A.R. Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh
- A.R. Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh
- Himland Executive Residences (Himland Housing (P) Ltd.) v. Gaj Raj Sahrawat & Ors.
- Himland Executive Residences (Himland Housing (P) Ltd.) v. Gaj Raj Sahrawat & Ors.
- Himland Executive Residences (Himland Housing (P) Ltd.) v. Gaj Raj Sahrawat & Ors.
- Khadgawan v. Ratan Singh
- Uttam Daga @ Uttam Kumar Daga v. The Union of India
- BALRAJ SINGH MALIK v. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL
- Company Petition No. 55 of 2002 · High Court
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.