Code of Criminal Procedure — Section 213
When manner of committing offence must be stated. When the
213.When manner of committing offence must be stated. When the nature of the case is such that the particulars mentioned in sections 211 and 212 do not give the accused sufficient notice of the matter with which he is charged, the charge shall also contain such particulars of the manner in which the alleged offence was committed as will be sufficient for that purpose.
Illustrations
(a) A is accused of the theft of a certain article at a certain time and place. The charge need not set out the manner in which the theft was effected.
(b) A is accused of cheating B at a given time and place. The charge must set out the manner in which A cheated B.
(c) A is accused of giving false evidence at a given time and place. The charge must set out that portion of the evidence given by A which is alleged to be false.
(d) A is accused of obstructing B, a public servant, in the discharge of his public functions at a given time and place. The charge must set out the manner in which A obstructed B in the discharge of his functions.
911
(e)A is accused of the murder of B at a given time and place. The charge need not state the manner in which A murdered B.
(f)A is accused of disobeying a direction of the law with intent to save B from punishment. The charge must set out the disobedience charged and the law infringed.
214.
Words in charge taken in sense of law under which offence ispunishable.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 213
- Paritosh Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
- SelviW/o. Palani v. State
- Dinesh Kumar Rana v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors
- Dinesh Kumar Rana v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
- Bhavesh Singh and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and another
- Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar
- SAIFAN v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer
- Sulochana Kumari v. The State of Bihar
- Brig. (Retd.) Jitender Kumar Narang v. Union of India
- Dr. K.V.K. Rao v. State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent of Police Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
- Velan v. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District
- Anand Kumar Singh v. For the Intervener
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
- Md. Aziz v. The State of Jharkhand
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.