September 03 v. The State
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Sumit Karmakar … for the State At the first call, a pass over was sought for by the petitioner. The matter was passed over. In the second call, the matter is taken up for consideration in the absence of the petitioner as the petitioner remains unrepresented since the same is a criminal revisional application and keeping this application pending by granting adjournments is likely to be an impediment in the criminal proceedings being proceeded with before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Port Blair. In this revisional application, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the FIR registered against him on 17th December, 2023 under section 25(1B)/(a)(g) of Arms Act 1959 at Aberdeen Police Station pursuant to the written report of the Central Industrial Security Force (in short ‘CISF’) after arresting the petitioner on having seized a live ammunition. The application is, therefore, dismissed for default. ( Arindam Mukherjee, J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.