CEXA No. 11 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
Appearance: Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharyya, Adv. Ms. Ekta Sinha, Adv. …for Appellant Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. …for Respondent THE COURT: Learned Advocate appearing appellant/department has placed a written instruction vide letter dated 21st May, 2025 seeking leave to withdraw this appeal as the monetary involvement in the matter is below Rs.2 Crores. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. The application (IA NO: GA/1/2023) also stands dismissed. The substantial questions suggested appellant/department are left open. The written instruction dated 21st May, 2025 is taken on record. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, CJ.) sm/pkd (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 10 Jul 2025. The bench was T S SIVAGNANAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.