✦ Calcutta High Court · 12 Aug 2025

In the goods of SARAL KUMAR GANGULY (Deceased)

Pla No. 358 of 2022SUGATO MAJUMDAR2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
12 Aug 2025
Bench
SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Outcome

Disposed of

The Probate application stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Appearance: Mr. Supratim Dhar, Sr. ADv. Mr. Satyabrata Chakraborty, Adv. R.Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Sourav Sardar, Adv. Mr. Bikash Kr. Roy, Adv. …for the Petitioner. The Court:- This is an application praying for grant of Probate of the last Will and Testament of the deceased Saral Kumar Ganguly dated 6.9.2020. The deceased Saral Kumar Ganguly alias Saral Ganguly alias Saral Kumar Gangopadhyay was a Hindu having place of residence at 58, Malanga Lane, P.O. & P.S. –Bowbazar, Kolkata- 700012 and also at Ganguly Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. – Samta, District – Howrah, Pin Code – 711303. Parents of the Testator predeceased him. He was a bachelor. He breathed his last on

Operative part

23.1.2021 at 58, Malanga Lane, Kolkata – 700012 as aforesaid. Prior to his death, he executed his last Will and Testament dated 6.9.2020. The present Petitioner, being nephew of the Testator was appointed as an executor. After death, the instant application has been filed praying for grant of Probate of the last Will and Testament of the deceased. Citations were issued. No caveat was lodged. There was paper publication also once in “English Daily” and once in “Bengali Daily”. The proceeding is, therefore, uncontentious. This Court directed that the Will shall be proved in solemn form. The attesting witnesses were examined as P.W. 1 and P.W. 3. Two attesting witnesses deposed in this Court and testified that the Testator was ailing but mentally alert. P.W. 1 identified the signature of the Testator and her own signature also. It was stated that the Will was executed in presence of the witnesses and she witnessed the execution of the Will putting signature after the Testator executed it. She further stated in evidence that the Testator was physically fit though because of nerve related issues he had trembling hands. Both the attesting witnesses proved due execution of the Will in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act. Death certificates have already been adduced in evidence and marked. Unchallenged testimony of the witnesses established that the Will was duly executed in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act. Accordingly, the Probate of the Will may be granted. Let the Probate be granted. Inventory and accounts shall be filed within six months from grant of Probate. The Probate application stands disposed of. (SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.) s.chandra

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Probate application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Succession Act, 1925 — s. 63.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Calcutta High Court, on 12 Aug 2025. The bench was SUGATO MAJUMDAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Pla No. 358 of 2022). ← Search more judgments