COMMERCIAL DIVISION v. ARCHANA SARAF
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, paragraph No.14 in the Order dated 17th July, 2025, shall be read as “Accordingly, the defendant is directed to pay the cost of Rs.1 lakh to the plaintiff.”
Judgment
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE CS-COM/760/2024 RAJIV KUMAR GARG ALIAS RAJIV GARG VS ARCHANA SARAF BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date: July 31, 2025. Appearance : Mr. K. C. Garg, Adv. …for the plaintiff
Mr. K. C. Garg, learned Counsel, is appearing for the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff has mentioned the matter for correction in the Order dated 17th July, 2025, he submits that in page No.4, paragraph No.14, this Court has awarded cost upon the defendant but in the said paragraph inadvertently it is recorded that the defendant is directed to pay the cost of Rs.1 lakh to the defendant instead of to the plaintiff.
Accordingly, paragraph No.14 in the Order dated 17th July, 2025, shall be read as “Accordingly, the defendant is directed to pay the cost of Rs.1 lakh to the plaintiff.”
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.