ESTATE OF SRI SRI ISWAR SITARAM JEW v. PRASUN BHATTACHARYA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE ACR 2 OF 2023 IN THE MATTER OF: ESTATE OF SRI SRI ISWAR SITARAM JEW AND PRODYUT KUMAR BANERJEE AND ANR. VS PRASUN BHATTACHARYA AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date : 12th June, 2023. Appearance: Ms. Amrita Panja Moulick, Adv. For petitioners Mr. Soumajit Mazumdar, Adv. Ms.Akanksha Mukherjee, Adv. For respondent no.6 Mr. Rahul Karmaker, Adv. Ms. S.D. Chowdhury, Adv. For respondent no.9 Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Debabrata Ray, Adv. Mr. Asif Sohail Tarafder, Adv. For respondent no.10 and 13 Mr. Rupak Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Sayani Das, Adv. Mr. Varun Kothari, Adv. Ms. Saolini Bose, Adv. For respondent no.11 Mr. Soumorai Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Debartha Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Bhawna Parasremka, Adv. Mr. Kritin Saraf, Adv. For respondent no.12 Mr. Debdut Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. A. Biswas, Adv. For intervenor on behalf of Mrs. Priya Ganguly The Court : This is an application, inter alia, under Section 7 of the Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920. The petitioners intend to withdraw this application in view of certain inadvertent error and file a fresh on the self-same 2 cause. Let this application be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh on the self-same cause, if permissible in law.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920 — s. 7.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 12 Jun 2023. The bench was ARINDAM MUKHERJEE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.