✦ Calcutta High Court · 22 Feb 2024

AP No. 34 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court

Ap No. 34 of 2024MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

Case at a glance

Order date
22 Feb 2024
Bench
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

Provisions considered

Judgment

Appearance: Mr. Ishaan Saha, Adv. Mr. Tanish Generiwala, Adv. Ms. Sananda Ganguli, Adv. ..for the petitioner The Court:- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to take appropriate steps for transfer of the application to the Commercial Division of this Court. Such leave is granted. Counsel, in any case, submits that the dispute is a commercial dispute as defined under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the claim is in excess of Rs.16 lakhs. Counsel is accordingly given leave to withdraw AP/34/2024, which is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel also seeks an order for condonation of delay on the ground that the petitioner is covered under Section 34(3) of the 1996 Act and read with the proviso. 2 It appears that the impugned Award is dated 29th September, 2023 and was received by the award-debtor on 13th October, 2023. The award-debtor filed the present application on 8th February, 2024. The three months under Section 34(3) would come to 12th January, 2024 and another 30 days would be 11th February, 2024. Hence the petitioner is in the nick of time, more precisely, three days short of the statutory time period. Since the petitioner has been given leave to take appropriate steps for transfer of the AP to the Commercial Division, the further period for the purpose of limitation is also condoned. This condonation is subject to the petitioner filing the AP in the Commercial Division by 1st March, 2024. (MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.) Bp.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — s. 2(1)(c)(i).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Calcutta High Court, on 22 Feb 2024. The bench was MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ap No. 34 of 2024). ← Search more judgments