✦ Calcutta High Court

Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL Mr. Kanishk Sinha, ..for & Ors.

Wpa No. 2833 of 2022M V MURALIDARAN

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/2833/2022 MA KALPANA ENTERPRISE & ANR. VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Kanishk Sinha, ..for the Petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on file. Learned counsel the petitioner has represented that while pendency of the suit, the present writ petition has been filed challenging the letter dated 29.3.2022 before this Court in this writ petition. While pendency of the writ petition an order of injunction was passed in the civil suit CS 27 of 2018 in favour of the petitioner and as on date no appeal has been filed challenging the injunction order granted by the Civil Court. Therefore now the petitioner’s prayer seeking for withdrawal of the letter dated 29.3.2022 in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2 Recording his submission this writ petition is closed by giving liberty to the parties to pursue the civil proceedings. WPA 2833 of 2022 is disposed of accordingly.

(M. V. MURALIDARAN, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wpa No. 2833 of 2022). ← Search more judgments