Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 409, 420, 471
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 s. 13(1)(d)
- Special Judge Essential Commodities Act
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having considered the relevant facts including the fact of more than five years having elapsed from the completion of investigation, we are of the view that the petitioner’s custodial interrogation is not required. We, however, deem it fit to impose certain conditions so that…
- Para 66. CRM(A) No. 570 of 2023 is hereby allowed and disposed of with the following directions.
- Para 88. We are of the view that the trial should be expedited since it has been five years from the completion of the investigation. We accordingly request the learned Court to make an effort to expedite the trial and complete the same within a period…
Judgment
Mr. Srijib Chakraborty For the Petitioner. Mr. Ujjwal Luksom Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee For the State. Mr. Sukanta Chakraborty Ms. Isha Acharya For the De-facto Complainant
The petitioner before us is the chairperson of the Cooch Behar Municipality. The allegation is that the petitioner was involved in bifurcation of a Government project and made money out of the alleged activities. The F.I.R. was registered on 4th December, 2016 and charge-sheet was filed on 13th February, 2018. The supplementary charge-sheet was filed on 5th March, 2018. The petitioner’s challenge to the charge-sheet was dismissed on 11th July, 2023.
According to learned counsel, it is more than five years from completion of investigation and further that the petitioner was not the sole decision making authority for the alleged acts. 2
Learned counsel appearing for the prosecution submits that the petitioner is involved in an economic offence and a large amount of money is at stake.
The de-facto complainant is also represented.
Having considered the relevant facts including the fact of more than five years having elapsed from the completion of investigation, we are of the view that the petitioner’s custodial interrogation is not required. We, however, deem it fit to impose certain conditions so that the petitioner makes herself available for trial or any other reason whatever and whenever the petitioner is required.
CRM(A) No. 570 of 2023 is hereby allowed and disposed of with the following directions.
The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event the petitioner is arrested upon furnishing a bond of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of who shall be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) Cum Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Sadar, Cooch Behar. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions of Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner shall make herself available before the jurisdictional police station once every month and not leave the jurisdictional limits of the police station without leave of the Court.
We are of the view that the trial should be expedited since it has been five years from the completion of the investigation. We accordingly request the learned Court to make an effort to expedite the trial and complete the same within a period of one year without granting 3 unnecessary adjournments. The one year is also as per the satisfaction of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
CRM(A) 570 of 2023 is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (PRASENJIT BISWAS,J.)
(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.