✦ Calcutta High Court

C.R.M.(NDPS) No. 222 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court

C.R.M.(NDPS) No. 222 of 2022ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, JOYMALYA BAGCHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Arjun Chowdhury Mr. Biswarup Roy ….. petitioner …… for the petitioner …… for the State Petitioner is in custody for 133 days. It is contended no narcotic substance was recovered from his possession. He has been arrested out of mere suspicion. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits petitioner and co-accuseds were dealing in narcotic substance above commercial quantity. He has criminal antecedents. We have considered the materials on record. No narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his complicity in the alleged offence has transpired from the statement of co-accused before police officer which is inadmissible in evidence. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion that petitioner has been able to rebut statutory restrictions under section 37 of the NDPS Act and in view of period of detention 2 suffered by the petitioner, he may be released on bail, however, two conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Cooch Behar(NDPS) on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that he shall meet the Officer-in-charge of Dinhata police Station once in a week until further orders. In the event petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. The application being CRM(NDPS) No. 222 of 2022 is disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 21(C), 29, 37; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Arms Act, 1959.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. C.R.M.(NDPS) No. 222 of 2022). ← Search more judgments