A) No. 344 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Suman Sehanabis (Mandal), Mr. Alok Sah. …For the petitioners Mr. Aditi Sankar Chakraborty, Mr. Biswarup Roy. ....For the State Application for anticipatory bail is filed on the ground that the petitioners are the Indian Nationals and have been falsely implicated under the Foreigners’ Act. It is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioners that his clients are the local villagers residing at the border. Counsel for the State opposes the prayer anticipatory bail. Having considered the materials in the case diary and bearing in mind the submissions made on behalf of the State, this Court finds that the petitioners are alleged to have harboured Foreign Nationals involved in cattle smuggling. 2 In view of the facts as aforesaid, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner cannot be considered at this stage and hence the same is rejected. The Case Diary be returned. C.R.M. (A) No. 344 of 2022 is, thus, dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.) (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.