Calcutta High Court · 2023

Mr. Sourav Ganguly Ms. Rishita Chakraborty Mr. Gopal Roy For the Petitioner Mr. Ujjwal Luksom Mr. Arjun Chowdhury For the State

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits before this Court that the present case is the outcome of a romantic relationship between an adolescence boy and an adolescence girl.

The learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have meticulously perused the entire materials available in the CD including the statement of the victim as recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, wherein we, prima facie, find materials that the accused petitioner and the victim girl were in a love relationship during their 2 adolescence age. The investigation is stated to have been completed in the meantime.

In view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above (supra), we are inclined to allow the prayer for bail to the present accused petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Ponnada Rahul shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) with two registered sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Kalimpong with a condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each date of substantive hearing subject to the provision of Section 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence and/or intimidate the witness in any manner whatsoever. In the event of non- compliance of any of the conditions, the bail shall stands automatically cancelled without any further reference to this Court.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (DB) 189 of 2024 is, accordingly, disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)