✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Outcome

Disposed of

petition stands disposed of

Judgment

Mr. Hirak Barman Ms. Rima Sarkar …for the State In the writ petition validity and legality of the order dated 29th January, 2024 passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 129 (3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. The learned advocate representing petitioner while making submission in support of the case made out in the writ petition submits that the order passed by the adjudicating authority is beyond the provisions of law which attracts invocation of the jurisdiction notwithstanding availability of appeal provisions under Section 107 of the relevant statute. The prayer of the petitioner has been opposed by the learned advocate representing the State authorities on the ground that there is no violation 2 of principle of natural justice while passing order dated 29th January, 2024 by the adjudicating authority. The notice of this Court has also been drawn to Section 107 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 which contemplates preferring an appeal against the order dated 29th January, 2024 passed by the adjudicating authority.

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking note of the provisions of Section 107 (1) of the said Act of 2017 this Court finds it apt not to entertain this writ petition in view of availability of appeal provisions under Section 107 of the said Act of 2017 keeping in view of the fact that it has been enunciated in umpteen number of cases by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that where efficacious alternative speedy remedy is available under the relevant provisions of the statute the Writ Court should not entertain the writ petition except in a case where it is found that there is gross violation of principle of natural justice. However, it has been submitted by the learned advocate representing the petitioner that goods and vehicles have been detained by the concerned respondent authorities in connection with the proceedings initiated against the petitioner. 3 Leave is granted to the petitioner to take steps for releasing the goods and vehicles upon complying with the formalities on furnishing bank guarantee as well as making necessary payment in accordance with the relevant provisions of the statute.

Operative part

If requisite bank guarantee is furnished and payment is made as per relevant provisions of the statute the authority shall take steps in accordance with law immediately for releasing the goods and vehicles. With above observations and directions writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — s. 129(3); Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — s. 107(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments