Adhir Kumar Pal & Ors. v. Suparna Mukherjee
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SHAMPA SARKAR
Outcome
Disposed of
application is disposed of
Provisions considered
- West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 s. 23(5)
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Tulshidas Ray Mr. Tirthankar Roy Mr. Ayan Banerjee Mr. Washim Dafader … for the Applicants. … for the Alleged Contemnor. The compliance report filed today is taken on record. The Pradhan, Karimpur-1 Gram Panchayat, has the compliance report which indicates proceedings were held and there is a finding of unauthorized construction. It is also submitted that the entire records have been sent to the Sub-Divisional Officer in terms of Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the said order or finding of the gram panchayat, the petitioners have adequate remedy by filing an appropriate proceeding, and also before the Sub-Divisional Officer who is also required to give a hearing to the parties before finally 2 passing an order on the basis of the report of the gram panchayat. Under circumstances, contempt application is disposed of. The contempt proceedings are dropped. (Shampa Sarkar, J. )
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 — s. 23(5).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.