✦ Calcutta High Court

WPA(P)/511/2024 v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.

HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. After hearing the learned advocates for the parties and for a considerable end of time and carefully 2 perusing the materials placed on record, we find that under the scheme of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 the control over the Council more particularly the…
  • Para 1010. Since the other issues which have been pointed out in the writ petition, in our opinion are not required to be gone into in this writ petition and, therefore, all those issues are left open.
  • Para 1111. With the above directions, the matter stands disposed of. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Judgment

2.

Mr. Sen, learned senior advocate appearing for the West Bengal Medical Council would submit that already recruitment notice has been issued for recruitment of the Posts of one Registrar and one Assistant Registrar and the process has already commenced and the preliminary examination has been fixed on 7th February, 2025.

3.

After hearing the learned advocates for the parties and for a considerable end of time and carefully 2 perusing the materials placed on record, we find that under the scheme of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 the control over the Council more particularly the service condition etc. of the employees is with the local Government. Section 14 deals with Registrar and Establishment of the Council. Sub-section (1) of Section 14 states that with the previous sanction of the local Government the Council (a) shall appoint a Registrar.

4.

Therefore, if a person needs to continue beyond the age of superannuation it pre-supposes and it is required to be pre-supposed with the prior consent of the Government has to be obtained since pay and allowances have to be sanctioned accordingly and what would be the pay payable to a person who is allowed extension of service beyond the age of superannuation or all issues which we have financial implications and has to be considered by the local Government.

5.

It is no doubt true that the Executive Council of the West Bengal Medical Council would be permitted to take a decision for extending the services of a particular officer of the Establishment of the Council for good and sufficient reasons but nonetheless that extension is subject to the approval of the Government.

6.

Therefore, we direct the private respondent, namely, 5th respondent, namely, who is presently functioning as Registrar of the West Bengal Medical 3 Council to step down of his own volition and the Medical Council shall forward the proposal for regularizing/approving his engagement beyond the age of superannuation by submitting appropriate proposal to the Government which shall be considered on merits and in accordance with law.

7.

This is required since the Government as early as on 25.10.2024 has informed the President of the West Bengal Medical Council that the 5th respondent has been appointed as Registrar on re-employment basis since 1.11.2019 without prior sanction of the Government following statutory provision laid down in Section 14(1) of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 and the Medical Council was advised to arrange for appointment of a new Registrar though this communication has been issued on 25.10.2024. Recruitment Notice has been issued only recently. However, the copy of the Recruitment Notice handed over to us by Mr. Sen, learned senior advocate appearing for the West Bengal Medical Council does not contain a date and only gives the other details.

8.

In any event the Government has stated that the appointment of the 5th respondent as Registrar on re-employment since 1.11.2019 has been made without prior sanction of the Government and, therefore, the 5th respondent has no right to continue to function as Registrar of the Medical Council. 4

9.

Therefore, as observed earlier, he shall step down on his own volition by 5 pm tomorrow i.e.

31.1.2025 or else there will be an order directing him to remove from the Post of Registrar of the Medical Council.

10.

Since the other issues which have been pointed out in the writ petition, in our opinion are not required to be gone into in this writ petition and, therefore, all those issues are left open.

11.

With the above directions, the matter stands disposed of. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments