✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

LALGOLA POLICE STATION CASE No. 271 of 2023DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Saryati DAtta Mr. Chitrak Biswas … for the petitioner. Ms. Zareen N. Khan Ms. Trina Mitra …for the State. Petitioner before us is named by the eye-witness recording statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be a participant in the murder. Considering the materials in the case diary, the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. C.R.M. (A) 5501 of 2023 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. LALGOLA POLICE STATION CASE No. 271 of 2023). ← Search more judgments