✦ Calcutta High Court

No. 111 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court

No. 111 of 2023

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Ujjal Ray Sk Abdur Rahim Mr. B K Ray Mr. Antyarikshya Basu …… for the petitioners …… for the State

2.

Chemical examiner’s report is placed on record. Sample tested positive to codeine phosphate. Materials on record show recovery of 3836 bottles of codeine phosphate above commercial quantity from the petitioner.

3.

Under such circumstances and in view of the statutory restrictions under section 37 of the NDPS Act, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

4.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 111 of 2023). ← Search more judgments