C.R.M.(DB) No. 4220 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 376DA, 384
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 6
Judgment
Ms. Busra Khatun ….for the petitioner Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Ms. Sima Biswas .… for the State
1.
Heard the learned Counsels for the parties.
2.
We have considered the materials on record. Offence involves gang rape of a minor. Vulnerable witness has not yet been examined. In view of gravity of the offence and primary role played by the petitioner in the crime, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
3.
The application for bail is, thus, rejected. . (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. C.R.M.(DB) No. 4220 of 2023).
← Search more judgments