SANKRAIL POLICE STATION CASE No. 603 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468
Judgment
Md. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Biswajit Sarkar Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. Bitrasok Banerji …for the petitioners. …for the State. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail. The police complaint revolves around a power of attorney. The original power of attorney ought to be in possession of the petitioners. The petitioners are unable to produce the same. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. C.R.M. (A) 5582 of 2022 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.