✦ Calcutta High Court

Shilarani Pradhan v. – The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Misc. Case No. 275 of 2023DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This revision petition is disposed of

Judgment

Mr. Raj Kumar Sain …. For the petitioner

1.

Present petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of the proceeding being Misc. Case No. 275 of 2023 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Haldia.

2.

Learned counsel submits that appropriate direction

4.

may be issued for the expeditious disposal. The speedy trial is a facet of fundamental right. The Court considers that no prejudice will be caused if an order is passed for the speedy trial as its benefit of the stakeholders.

5.

In the facts and circumstances learned judge is directed to conduct expeditious proceedings of Misc. Case 275 of 2023 under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in accordance with law without giving unnecessary adjournment.

Operative part

6.

This revision petition is disposed of.

7.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This revision petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Misc. Case No. 275 of 2023). ← Search more judgments