✦ Calcutta High Court

Suraj Kamkar v. The Howrah Municipal Corporation & Ors.

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the HMC would submit that though the sanction was up to the 2nd floor level, the building in question has been constructed up to the G+6 thereby additional 4 floors have been constructed which are entirely illegal. The report…
  • Para 44. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Sureka … For Howrah Municipal Corporation Mr. Joy Chakraborty Mr. Sandip Dinda …..for the Pvt. respondents

1.

Complaining illegal construction at the behest of the private respondents at premises No. 27/1, Madan Biswas Lane, Ward No. 11, under HMC and the failure on the part of the municipal authority to resist the illegal construction, the instant writ petition has been filed. Pursuant to the order dated 24th March, 2026, municipality has filed a report.

2.

Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the HMC would submit that though the sanction was up to the 2nd floor level, the building in question has been constructed up to the G+6 thereby additional 4 floors have been constructed which are entirely illegal. The report also demonstrates that there is WPA 25741 of 2024 2 deviation of the sanctioned plan on the 1st floor as well. The aforesaid would demonstrate total neglect and failure on the part of the municipal authorities. The municipal authorities have not even bothered to prevent the illegal construction despite the petitioner lodging a complaint on 11th September, 2024. The municipal authorities obviously sat tight over the matter only when this Court had taken up the matter, a stop work notice issued on 5th March, 2024 has been placed before the Court to demonstrate that the municipality had taken action. No steps appear to have been taken either by the municipal authorities or by the police authorities to implement the same despite the police authorities being put on notice. The municipal authorities have also failed to take further steps in relation to the aforesaid illegal and unauthorized construction which is standing. Ordinarily, the illegality of constructing additional floors could not have been possible without the notice and knowledge of the municipal authorities. The active convenience of a Section of the municipal staff and the police to permit this gross illegality cannot be ruled out. It is, therefore, the municipal authorities and thepolice authorities to take appropriate steps and action against the earning officers as may be necessary. WPA 25741 of 2024 3 Accordingly, let this order be placed before the respondent Nos. 2 and 5 for appropriate action at their end. A report in this regard may be filed before the learned Registrar General within eight weeks. Once the report is filed, the same shall be tagged with this file.

3.

Be that as it may, noting that the illegal construction has already taken place, municipal authorities must forthwith initiate proceedings under Section 177 of the HMC Act, 1980 and bring such proceedings to a logical conclusion on an expeditious basis preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. The municipality must also file a compliance report before the learned Registrar General within eight weeks from date.

Operative part

4.

With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments