✦ Calcutta High Court

Asha Bansal & Ors. v. Sarika Shaw & Anr.

CP C.O No. 3730 of 2023SHAMPA SARKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The revisional application is disposed of with a

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Subhankar Chakraborty Mr. Saptarshi Bhattacharjee …..for the petitioners. By this application, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of Ejectment Suit No.70 of 2022, which is pending before the learned Judge, 12th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta. It is submitted that three applications are pending along with the suit. One application is for transposition and the second is an application under Order 39 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the third under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The prayer of the petitioners is innocuous. Neither party stands to lose if a proceeding is disposed of expeditiously. In fact, such expeditious disposal shall enure to the benefit of the parties. Hence, there is no requirement for service of prior notice upon the opposite parties. The revisional application is disposed of with a direction upon the learned court below to dispose of the application for transposition, within two months 2 from the next date fixed. Thereafter, the other two applications shall be disposed of within four months as per the seriality they deserve. Adequate opportunity shall be granted to the parties to contest the same. Upon disposal of the applications, the learned court below shall make sincere endeavour to dispose of the suit within two years. This court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the pending applications and the suit. The learned court shall proceed independently and in accordance with law. A copy of the revisional application along with a server copy of this order be served upon the opposite parties and/or learned advocate contesting the matter on behalf of the opposite parties in the learned court below, within a week. The revisional application is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The revisional application is disposed of with a

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 r. 7; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 — s. 7(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CP C.O No. 3730 of 2023). ← Search more judgments