✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

No. 409 of 2020

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Lalbag, Murshidabad on condition that the petitioner shall appear before…

Judgment

Mr. Sagar Saha Mr. Nur Nobi Seikh Mr. Binay Panda Ms. Puspita Saha …… for the petitioner. …… for the State

2.

Heard learned Advocates for the parties. The petitioner is in custody for 34 days. No one was injured in course of the incident. The petitioner prays for bail.

3.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the bail prayer.

4.

We have considered the materials on record. Keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the crime as there is no chance of his abscondance, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Operative part

5.

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Lalbag, Murshidabad on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. 2

6.

In the event petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

7.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 427, 447; Explosive Substances Act — ss. 3, 4.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 409 of 2020). ← Search more judgments