Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHITTA RANJAN DASH, PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the application being CRM (A) 4708 of 2023 is dismissed as ‘not pressed’. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2
Judgment
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick Mr. Pravas Bhattacharya Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg …for the petitioners. … for the State.
1.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the application for anticipatory bail.
3.
Accordingly, the application being CRM (A) 4708 of 2023 is dismissed as ‘not pressed’. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments