D/L.17 v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee Mr. Anik Biswas …for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against a representation dated October 3, 2023 seeking permission to protect the subject premises. The State is represented and submits that the permission sought for by the petitioner cannot be authorized. In view of the fact that the representation was filed as far back as on October 3, 2023 and has not yet been disposed of, WPA 24765 of 2024 is disposed of by directing the respondent no. 2 to consider and dispose of representation of the petitioners dated October 3, 2023 within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order the said respondent after giving a right of hearing to the affected parties including the petitioners, 2 accordance with law and without being influenced by any observation or direction made in this order. In disposing of the above representation, the concerned authority will also consideration the applicability of dection 26 of the Panchayat Act, 1973 and deal with the same as contended on behalf of the petitioner. It is made clear that there has been no adjudication on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be decided by the respondent no. 2 in accordance with law. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.