✦ Calcutta High Court

WPA(P)/426/2024 v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.

HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Kalyan Kumar Chakraborty, Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar ..for the Petitioner. Mr. Jaharlal De, Mr. Shamimul Bari ..for the State. Mr. Ayan Banerjee, Ms. Debasree Dhamali, Ms. Riya Ghosh ..for the Respondent No.4.

1.

The petitioner alleges that a land has been illegally used for the purpose other than being maintained as a water body.

2.

The learned advocate appearing for the private respondent submitted that an order has been passed by the Collector under Section 4C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 dated 13th January, 2023 by which conversion has been approved.

3.

As long as the order of conversion remains, the question of issuing a direction as sought for in the writ petition does not arise.

Operative part

4.

Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments