REJINAGAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 122 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 438(2)
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 482, 482(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 308, 325, 354, 379, 448
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the materials available in the case diary and the injury report, and the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.
- Para 44. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Asirul Mollick @ Asirul Mallik shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to…
- Para 55. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee For the Petitioner Mr. Sujoy Sarkar For the State
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that over a case and counter case a false complaint has been lodged against the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State in opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail has referred to the statement of the injured and the injury report. The prognosis, as shown in the injury report of the pregnant lady, appears to be simple and subsequent medical report has not suggested any possible miscarriage due to such assault.
Considering the materials available in the case diary and the injury report, and the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Asirul Mollick @ Asirul Mallik shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Signed By : AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 25 th of September 2024 03:51:11 PM 2 Officer and also to comply with the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Murshidabad at Berhampur, corresponding to G.R Case No. 2505 of 2024 within two weeks from date and the petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. It is further ordered that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the aforesaid Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused. In the event of non- compliance of any of the conditions, the anticipatory bail shall stand automatically cancelled without any further reference to this Court.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar, J) Signed By : AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 25 th of September 2024 03:51:11 PM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.