DOMKAL P.S. CASE No. 294 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 302
Judgment
Mr. Soumik Ganguly, Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ms. Sonali Das …petitioner …for the petitioner …for the State The petitioner has prayed for bail merely on the ground of long detention due to failure on the part of the learned Magistrate to commit the case to the Court of Sessions even after submission of charge-sheet and for the reason that factually the alleged incident occurred during hit of the moment on the issue of plucking of mango from mango trees between the brothers. One of the brothers was assaulted by the others and succumbed to injuries. We have carefully perused the case diary especially the statement of the witnesses recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner previously made application with similar prayer and the said application was rejected by the Division Bench of this Court on 26th May, 2022. Considering the materials in the case diary and in view of the fact that there is no change in circumstance from 26th May, 2022, the prayer for bail is rejected. 2 Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Berhampore, Murshidabad is directed to commit the case diary to the Court of Sessions positively by the next date fixed. (Bibek Chaudhuri, J.) (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.