CANNING P.S. CASE No. 494 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120B, 201, 212, 302
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27, 34, 35
Judgment
Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee …… for the petitioner Mr. Binay Panda Ms. Puspita Saha …… for the State Learned advocate for the petitioner does not wish to press this application. Accordingly, the application for bail being CRM (DB) No. 3596 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CANNING P.S. CASE No. 494 of 2021).
← Search more judgments