KALIGANJ P.S. CASE No. 445 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 328, 379, 411, 413
Judgment
Mr. Sumanta Das Mr. Goutam Wilson ….Petitioner …for the Petitioner …for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for 137 days. He prays for bail. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. Stolen property has already been recovered. Under such circumstances, in view of the period of detention suffered by the petitioner and as the co-accused has already been granted bail, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of `10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia at Krishnagar subject to the condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on every day of hearing until further orders 2 and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail of the petitioner without any further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, thus, allowed. (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.