Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 409
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 s. 13(1)(a)
Judgment
Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Advocate Mr. Souvik Sen .…for the petitioner in CRM(A)4239/23 Mr. Dipankar Dandapath, Mr. Souvik Sen …for the petitioner in CRM(A)4241/23 Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Koushik Kundu .…for the State in CRM(A)4239/23 Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Mainak Gupta …for the State in CRM(A)4241/23 2 Two applications for anticipatory bail are taken up for consideration analogously as they emanate out of the same police case. Both the petitioners in the two applications for anticipatory bail were granted interim anticipatory bail on October 16, 2023 passed by the co-ordinate Bench. It is submitted on behalf of the State that, police filed charge-sheet and that, the petitioners in the two applications for anticipatory bail were called as witnesses to the incident by the Investigating Officer. It is submitted on behalf of the State that, police are investigating into 48 schemes out of which in respect of two police filed charge-sheet. In those two the petitioners are not accused. Memo of evidence submitted in Court be taken on record. At this stage, police are not considering either of the petitioners as an accused in any of the schemes. In such circumstances, the question of enlarging any of the petitioners on anticipatory bail does not arise as there is no apprehension of arrest. C.R.M.(A) 4239 of 2023 and C.R.M.(A) 4241 of 2023 are disposed of accordingly. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.