SAFIL MALLICK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Judgment
Mr. Archishman Singh, Mr. Habibur Rahaman ..for the Petitioner. Mr. Jahar Lal De, Ms. Smita Das Dey ..for the State.
#1. The learned advocate for the petitioner has placed a letter from his client stating that he does not wish to press this writ petition.
#2. The said letter is kept on record.
#3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wpa No. 21837 of 2018).
← Search more judgments