✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

BELIABERA POLICE STATION CASE No. 41 of 2015

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioners, namely, Utpal Mahata @ Uttpal Mahata and Gobinda Mahata, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction…
  • Para 66. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. ( Gaurang Kanth, J. ) ( Joymalya Bagchi, J. ) Signed By : ABHIJIT KOLE High Court of Calcutta 18 th of September 2024 11:17:44 AM

Judgment

Mr. Avik Ghatak, Mr. Fahad Imam, … For the Petitioners. Mrs. Anasuya Sinha, Md. Zubair Alam, … For the State.

2.

Heard the learned lawyers for both the parties. Petitioner no. 1 is in custody for 63 days and petitioner no. 2 is in custody for 66 days respectively. Co-accused have been granted bail/anticipatory bail.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to extend the same privilege to the petitioners.

4.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioners, namely, Utpal Mahata @ Uttpal Mahata and Gobinda Mahata, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhargram and on further conditions that the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. Signed By : ABHIJIT KOLE High Court of Calcutta 18 th of September 2024 11:17:44 AM 2

5.

In the event the petitioners fail to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail in accordance with law without further reference to this court.

6.

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. ( Gaurang Kanth, J. ) ( Joymalya Bagchi, J. ) Signed By : ABHIJIT KOLE High Court of Calcutta 18 th of September 2024 11:17:44 AM

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BELIABERA POLICE STATION CASE No. 41 of 2015). ← Search more judgments