Court v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Mr. Nikhil Kumar Gupta, Advocate & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
In the High Court at0 Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 22964 OF 2025 DIPAK KUMAR PAKHIRA & ANR. VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Nikhil Kumar Gupta, Advocate Ms. Laboni Bar, Advocate ……for the Petitioners
Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.
The petitioners seek issuance of a writ condoning the delay in filing an application under Section 17 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, the said Act) by him before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Kolkata. The petitioners submit that they are willing to settle the account with the Bank.
The petitioners are at liberty to approach the Bank with such proposal of settlement, if so advised.
In view of the afore-stated, no adjudication is required in the instant writ-petition.
WPA 22964 of 2025 is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. (REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.) P a g e | 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.