✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

No. 235 of 2009AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail refused

Accordingly, the application for bail is dismissed as not

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Ms. R Sreemani Mr. D Chatterjee Ms. Debjani Dasgupta …… for the petitioners …… for the State Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that his client does not wish to proceed further with the application. Accordingly, the application for bail is dismissed as not pressed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application for bail is dismissed as not

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 376, 417, 493.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 235 of 2009). ← Search more judgments