✦ Calcutta High Court

SAMIR KUMAR DAS @ BISHNUPADA DAS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.

Wpa No. 22367 of 2024HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Case at a glance

Bench
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Outcome

Withdrawn

petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Ayan Banerjee, Ms. Debjani Sengupta, Ms. Poulami Ghosh ..for the Petitioner. Mr. Asish Kumar Guha, Ms. Benazir Ahmed ..for the State. Mr. C.N. Sarkar, Mr. Sounak Mandal ..for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. After some argument Mr Banerjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for implementation of the order of status quo. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for by the learned Advocate of the petitioner.

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Wpa No. 22367 of 2024). ← Search more judgments