12.2022 Sl.No.18 Ct.19 sn WPA 21979 of 2022 Sarat Jana v. The State of West Bengal Mr. Saunak Ghosh Mr. Anindya Sundar Das & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Ananya Chakraborty ..for the respdt.2 Mr. Sakya Maity Mr. Subhas Jana ..for the respdts.7-13 The petitioner alleges that the respondent nos. 7 to 13 have raised certain unauthorised structures on Dag Nos. 596 and 756, J.L. No. 128 of mouza Unal within Block Bhagwanpur-I. It is contended that such construction was without any permission from the Simuliya Gram Panchayat. Learned advocate for the Gram Panchayat submits that no permission for such construction had been granted to the respondent nos. 7 to 13. Learned advocate for the respondent nos. 7 to 13 submits that the constructions were under a housing scheme, namely, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) which was exempted from the applicability of Section 23 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Reference is made to Proviso 1 of Rule 19 of the West Bengal Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Administration) Rules
Operative part
2004. It is an admitted position that construction of 2 houses under the poverty alleviation programme would not require permission the Gram Panchayat. It is not possible for the Court to ascertain the correctness of such statement made on behalf of the respondent nos. 7 to 13. The petitioner shall approach the Pradhan of Simuliya Anchal Gram Panchayat for a clarification as to whether the respondent nos. 7 to 13 had been permitted to raise constructions under the PMAY(G) Scheme. Whether the said respondents had been short listed as beneficiaries shall be answered by the panchayat authorities. If found that the constructions have been made under the PMAY(G) scheme, in that event the only issue that would be decided is whether the constructions were made in accordance with the model plan/drawing supplied to the beneficiary under the scheme. If it is found that the constructions by the respondent nos. 7 to 13 were not permitted under the scheme, the panchayat authorities shall proceed in accordance with law upon hearing all the parties. The parties shall be heard and a reasoned order shall be passed. Such order shall be communicated to all. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the petitioner’s representation. 3 Before any final decision is taken, a spot inspection in presence of all the parties shall be made and the report, so prepared, upon such inspection shall be circulated amongst all the parties. This writ petition is disposed of. There will be, however, no order as to costs. All parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 — s. 23.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.