Chittaranjan Das v. Mr. Anindya Karforma & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 s. 400(1)
Judgment
Chittaranjan Das Vs. Mr. Anindya Karforma & ors. Mr. Sukanta Chakraborty, Mr. Anindya Halder …for the petitioner Mr. Alak Kr. Ghosh, Mr. Swapan Kr. Debnath …for the alleged contemnors The authorities were directed to complete a proceeding under Section 400(1) of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Learned advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors submits that such proceeding stood concluded by an order dated March 5, 2020. He makes over a copy of the order to the learned advocate for the petitioner in Court. In view of the authorities acting in terms of the order of the High Court, no further interference is called for. C.P.A.N.1190 of 2019 is disposed of without any order as to costs. (Debangsu Basak, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.