✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Ankan Das. ….for the Petitioner. Ms. Zareen N. Khan, Mr. Asif Dewan. ….for the State. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. Rishav Singh, Mr. Dibyayan Banerjee. …for the Opp. Party No.2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Conditions of bail imposed on the petitioner vide order dated 27.03.2023 are waived. Other conditions of bail shall continue. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments