✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

BISWAJIT BASU

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Ali Imam Shah. ……for the petitioner. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Order No.03 dated August 03, 2024 passed by the 1st Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Durgapur, District : Paschim Bardhaman in MAC Case No. 115 of 2024 is under challenge. The learned Tribunal by the order impugned has dismissed an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as not maintainable, the said order is open to appeal under Section 173 thereof. The revisional application is not maintainable, C.O. 3090 of 2024 is dismissed as such without any order as to costs. Liberty, however, is granted to the learned advocate-on-record for the petitioner to take back the certified copy of the order impugned upon furnishing a photocopy thereof. Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Biswajit Basu, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments