DURGAPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 214 of 2020 · Calcutta High Court

Mr. Soumpriyo Choudhury, Advocate Mr. Joydeep Biswas, Advocate Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Advocate … … For the Petitioners Mr. Ranabir Roy Choudhury, Advocate Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Advocate … …For the State Mr. Anindya Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Apurba Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Tarojit Roy, Advocate Mr. Krishan Ray, Advocate … … For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. Report submitted on behalf of the State be taken on record. The report states that the original trust deeds were seized. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein and considering the materials in the case diary and considering the age of the two petitioners, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before 2 the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 4470 of 2022 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)