BONGAON P.S. CASE No. 217 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Ms. Srimoyee Mukherjee, Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee, Mr. Sourav Mondal. …for the Petitioner. Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Avik Ghatak. ...for the State. Petitioner is in custody for 210 days. He prays for bail. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. Statement of the minor victim implicates the petitioner in the offence of penetrative sexual assault. In view of the gravity of the offence and the prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.