Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 308, 323, 325, 341
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, CRM(A) 3755 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Judgment
In the matter of : Madhu Sarkar @ Madhusridhan @ Mashusudan Sarkar @ Madhusudan Sarkar … Petitioner Ms. Chandrima Debnath ... for the petitioner Mr. Goutam Banerjee, Mr. Abhra Mukherjee … for the State
#1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that her clients do not want to press this application anticipatory bail.
#2. Accordingly, CRM(A) 3755 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BHARATPUR P.S. CASE No. 242 of 2023).
← Search more judgments