✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

MOLLARPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 181 of 2021DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI

Case at a glance

Judgment

Mr. Prasenjit Mukherjee Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty …for the petitioner. Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta …for the State. Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that commercial quantity of narcotics was seized along with the motor vehicle belonging to the petitioner. The seizure of the commercial quantity of narcotics was made along with the seizure of the motor vehicle belonging to the petitioner. Constructive possession of the petitioner over the seized commercial quantity of narcotics cannot be overlooked at this stage. In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is unable to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Consequently, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. C.R.M. (A) 4313 of 2022 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MOLLARPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 181 of 2021). ← Search more judgments