✦ Calcutta High Court

BHAGWANPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 183 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court

BHAGWANPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 183 of 2022DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Mr. Nazir Ahmed, Advocates … … For the Petitioner Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee, Advocate … …For the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the injury report. Apparently, the injured did not suffer grievous hurt. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 2 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 4259 of 2022 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BHAGWANPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 183 of 2022). ← Search more judgments