SANTIPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 694 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 341, 376AB
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 6
Judgment
Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Mr. Karan Bapuli, … For the State. Order dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.:
The petitioner says that he is in custody for 100 days. He has been falsely implicated. He has no role to play in the alleged offence. He prays for bail.
We have seen the statement of the victim girl, three years old at the time of the incident and her mother, recorded under Section 164 Cr. P. C. Both the statements prima facie implicate the petitioner. The medical report also supports the prosecution case. It records that there has been sexual interference with the three year old child.
In view of the prima facie incriminating material against the petitioner, we are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
CRM (DB) 2627 of 2024 is, thus, dismissed.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. ( Prasenjit Biswas, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.