DB) No. 2991 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
Accordingly, application for bail is dismissed as not
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 376(2)(f), 376AB
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 6
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Sabir Ahamed Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das .… for the petitioner Ms. Faria Hossain Mr. Anand Keshari .…. for the State Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits his client does not want to proceed with the application for bail. Accordingly, application for bail is dismissed as not pressed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, application for bail is dismissed as not
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 376(2)(f), 376AB; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 6.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.