✦ Calcutta High Court

BAISHNABNAGAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 428 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court

BAISHNABNAGAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 428 of 2023CHITTA RANJAN DASH, PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Case at a glance

Bench
CHITTA RANJAN DASH, PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. The application being CRM (A) 3509 of 2023 is disposed of. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 3

Judgment

Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Debapriya Majumder Mr. Binay Panda Ms. Puspita Saha Mr. Swakshar Kumar Mondal …for the petitioner. …for the State. …for the de facto complainant.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for both the parties.

2.

So far as the assault on the deceased is concerned. It is fairly submitted at the Bar that one Kabir Sk had stabbed the deceased with a knife from his backside which subsequently caused his death. So far as the present petitioner (who is a lady) it is alleged that she along with others were present in the offending group being armed with weapons. However, no specific overt act has been attributed to the present petitioner so far as the death of the deceased is concerned.

3.

Regard being had to such facts and submissions, factum of permanent residence of the petitioner, nature of allegation and substantial progress in investigation, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer in the event of her arrest in the aforesaid P.S. case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including the condition that: i) The petitioner is directed to appear before the I.O. 2 for the purpose of investigation as and when required from sunrise to sunset till submission of F.F.

4.

The concerned Arresting Officer is hereby directed to act upon the server copy of this order.

5.

Within 21 days from today the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. along with a server copy/certified copy of this order. If server copy is supplied, learned I.O. shall act upon that.

6.

Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is allowed.

7.

The application being CRM (A) 3509 of 2023 is disposed of. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BAISHNABNAGAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 428 of 2023). ← Search more judgments