✦ Calcutta High Court

BELDANGA POLICE STATION CASE No. 229 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court

BELDANGA POLICE STATION CASE No. 229 of 2024SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Anisur Rahaman Mr. Souman De Mr. Rajes Jana Petitioners For the Petitioners For the State

1.

We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The victim had died within three years of marriage.

3.

Considering the materials available in the case diary and more particularly the statements of the father of the victim and the neighbours and relatives of the victim directly implicating the petitioners for physical and mental torture upon the victim over demand of dowry, we are not inclined to allow the prayer for anticipatory bail.

4.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BELDANGA POLICE STATION CASE No. 229 of 2024). ← Search more judgments